{ "meta": { "schemaVersion": 3, "documentType": "personal_freedom_index_assessment_spec", "title": "Personal Freedom Indicator", "authoritativeQuestionLocale": "en", "description": "Structured description of questionnaire content, scoring, tier labels, anonymous profile fields, and live app experience for external simulation and AI tooling. Authoritative question text for AI is questionsByLocale.en (also rendered on /about/). The live app serves ten fully localized UI and question banks; this JSON embeds ja/en/zh.", "aboutPageUrl": "https://personal-freedom-indicator.pages.dev/about/", "generatedAtUtc": "2026-06-03T14:27:54.937336Z" }, "questionCount": 24, "indexCoreQuestionCount": 24, "indexCoreQuestionIds": [ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 ], "indexSupplementaryQuestionIds": [], "categoryCount": 6, "categories": [ { "index": 0, "labelJa": "経済", "labelEn": "Economic", "labelZh": "经济" }, { "index": 1, "labelJa": "時間", "labelEn": "Time", "labelZh": "时间" }, { "index": 2, "labelJa": "場所", "labelEn": "Place", "labelZh": "场所" }, { "index": 3, "labelJa": "身体", "labelEn": "Health", "labelZh": "身心" }, { "index": 4, "labelJa": "人間関係", "labelEn": "Relationships", "labelZh": "人际关系" }, { "index": 5, "labelJa": "組織", "labelEn": "Organization", "labelZh": "组织" } ], "dimensionTagIds": [ "economic", "time", "place", "health", "relationships", "organization" ], "questionTagsById": { "1": [ "economic" ], "2": [ "economic" ], "3": [ "economic" ], "4": [ "economic", "time" ], "5": [ "place" ], "6": [ "place", "economic" ], "7": [ "economic", "relationships", "organization" ], "8": [ "place", "economic" ], "9": [ "time" ], "10": [ "time", "economic" ], "11": [ "health" ], "12": [ "time", "relationships" ], "13": [ "health", "time", "organization" ], "14": [ "time", "relationships" ], "15": [ "relationships" ], "16": [ "economic", "time" ], "17": [ "health" ], "18": [ "health", "time", "economic" ], "19": [ "relationships", "health" ], "20": [ "organization" ], "21": [ "economic", "relationships", "organization" ], "22": [ "organization" ], "23": [ "relationships", "organization", "economic" ], "24": [ "health", "economic", "place" ] }, "dimensionMaxPoints": [ 26, 16, 8, 12, 14, 12 ], "questionCategoryOrder": [ 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 2, 0, 2, 2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 4, 0, 3, 3, 4, 5, 0, 5, 4, 3 ], "scoring": { "choicePoints": { "A": 2, "B": 1, "C": 0, "N_A": 0 }, "indexUsesCoreQuestionsOnly": true, "naExcludedFromIndex": true, "naApplicabilityPolicy": "N/A is reserved for objective non-applicability only (the premise of the question does not apply, e.g. no such contract, role, or household). It must not be used as a generic skip for uncertainty, discomfort, or refusal; use A/B/C or redesign the item. See project spec §5.1.1.", "nullOrUnansweredExcluded": true, "personalFreedomIndex": { "description": "Index from 0 to 100 from valid A/B/C answers on core questions only (ids in indexCoreQuestionIds; supplementary ids excluded). Higher means more freedom in this instrument's definition.", "formula": "index = round( clamp( 0, 100, (S / (2 * n)) * 100 ) )", "variables": { "S": "Sum of choice points (A=2, B=1, C=0) over valid core answers.", "n": "Count of valid core answers (excludes N/A, null/unanswered, and supplementary question ids)." }, "whenNIsZero": { "index": 0, "note": "If there are no valid answers, the index is defined as 0." }, "equivalentWhenAllAnswered": "When all 24 core questions are valid, index = round((S / (2*n)) * 100)." } }, "personalFreedomIndexTiers": [ { "level": 1, "minIndexInclusive": 0, "maxIndexInclusive": 29, "labelEn": "C: Highly Structured", "labelJa": "C: Highly Structured（高構造化）" }, { "level": 2, "minIndexInclusive": 30, "maxIndexInclusive": 59, "labelEn": "B: Partially Constrained", "labelJa": "B: Partially Constrained（部分的制約）" }, { "level": 3, "minIndexInclusive": 60, "maxIndexInclusive": 89, "labelEn": "A: Autonomous", "labelJa": "A: Autonomous（自律的）" }, { "level": 4, "minIndexInclusive": 90, "maxIndexInclusive": 100, "labelEn": "S: Independent", "labelJa": "S: Independent（完全独立）" } ], "anonymousProfile": { "purpose": "Optional anonymous cohort attributes for aggregate statistics and for enriching AI consultation prompts. No name, email, or contact details are collected.", "privacy": "Processed on the client. A one-time anonymous stats payload may be sent when the user opens the AI consultation wizard on the result screen. Subjective wellbeing (1–5) is separate and does not affect the Personal Freedom Indicator.", "cohortGateRequiredFields": [ "ageBand", "gender", "countryAlpha2", "familyStructure", "employmentType" ], "aiConsultationWizardRequiredFields": [ "ageBand", "gender", "countryAlpha2", "familyStructure", "employmentType", "educationLevel", "industrySector", "occupationCategory" ], "fields": [ { "field": "countryAlpha2", "apiQueryKey": "Country", "description": "ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 country of residence. Mapped to a macro region for sparse-data analytics.", "requiredForCohortGate": true, "requiredForAiConsultationWizard": true, "optional": false, "type": "iso3166Alpha2" }, { "field": "ageBand", "apiQueryKey": "AgeBand", "description": "Ordinal age band.", "requiredForCohortGate": true, "requiredForAiConsultationWizard": true, "optional": false, "enumValues": [ { "value": "under20", "apiKey": "U20", "labelEn": "Under 20" }, { "value": "twenties", "apiKey": "20s", "labelEn": "20s" }, { "value": "thirties", "apiKey": "30s", "labelEn": "30s" }, { "value": "forties", "apiKey": "40s", "labelEn": "40s" }, { "value": "fifties", "apiKey": "50s", "labelEn": "50s" }, { "value": "sixties", "apiKey": "60s", "labelEn": "60s" }, { "value": "seventies", "apiKey": "70s", "labelEn": "70s" }, { "value": "eightyPlus", "apiKey": "80p", "labelEn": "80+" } ] }, { "field": "gender", "apiQueryKey": "Gender", "description": "Gender (analytics).", "requiredForCohortGate": true, "requiredForAiConsultationWizard": true, "optional": false, "enumValues": [ { "value": "male", "apiKey": "M", "labelEn": "Male" }, { "value": "female", "apiKey": "F", "labelEn": "Female" }, { "value": "other", "apiKey": "O", "labelEn": "Other" }, { "value": "preferNot", "apiKey": "X", "labelEn": "Prefer not to say" } ] }, { "field": "residenceArea", "apiQueryKey": "ResidenceArea", "description": "Two-level urbanization band under the selected country. Neutral wording: large metro area vs mid-size city, town, or other.", "requiredForCohortGate": false, "requiredForAiConsultationWizard": false, "optional": true, "shownWhen": "countryAlpha2 is set", "enumValues": [ { "value": "majorMetropolitan", "apiKey": "METRO", "labelEn": "Large metro area" }, { "value": "regional", "apiKey": "REGION", "labelEn": "Mid-size city, town, or other" } ] }, { "field": "familyStructure", "apiQueryKey": "Family", "description": "Household / family structure.", "requiredForCohortGate": true, "requiredForAiConsultationWizard": true, "optional": false, "enumValues": [ { "value": "single", "apiKey": "SINGLE", "labelEn": "Single" }, { "value": "partnerNoKids", "apiKey": "PARTNER_NK", "labelEn": "Partner, no children" }, { "value": "partnerWithKids", "apiKey": "PARTNER_K", "labelEn": "Partner, with children" }, { "value": "singleParent", "apiKey": "SParent", "labelEn": "Single parent" }, { "value": "other", "apiKey": "FAM_OTHER", "labelEn": "Other" } ] }, { "field": "childrenCount", "apiQueryKey": "ChildrenCount", "description": "Number of dependent children when family structure implies children.", "requiredForCohortGate": false, "requiredForAiConsultationWizard": false, "optional": true, "shownWhen": "familyStructure is partnerWithKids, singleParent, or other", "enumValues": [ { "value": "zero", "apiKey": "C0", "labelEn": "0" }, { "value": "one", "apiKey": "C1", "labelEn": "1" }, { "value": "two", "apiKey": "C2", "labelEn": "2" }, { "value": "three", "apiKey": "C3", "labelEn": "3" }, { "value": "fourPlus", "apiKey": "C4P", "labelEn": "4 or more" } ] }, { "field": "employmentType", "apiQueryKey": "Employment", "description": "Primary employment / activity type.", "requiredForCohortGate": true, "requiredForAiConsultationWizard": true, "optional": false, "enumValues": [ { "value": "fullTimeEmployee", "apiKey": "FT", "labelEn": "Full-time employee" }, { "value": "partTimeEmployee", "apiKey": "PT", "labelEn": "Part-time employee" }, { "value": "publicOrNonprofit", "apiKey": "PUB", "labelEn": "Public sector / nonprofit" }, { "value": "executive", "apiKey": "EXEC", "labelEn": "Executive / management owner" }, { "value": "selfEmployedFreelance", "apiKey": "SELF", "labelEn": "Self-employed / freelance" }, { "value": "student", "apiKey": "STU", "labelEn": "Student" }, { "value": "retiredUnemployed", "apiKey": "RET", "labelEn": "Retired / unemployed" } ] }, { "field": "educationLevel", "apiQueryKey": "Education", "description": "Highest completed education level.", "requiredForCohortGate": false, "requiredForAiConsultationWizard": true, "optional": true, "enumValues": [ { "value": "highSchoolOrEquivalent", "apiKey": "HS", "labelEn": "High school or equivalent (final education)" }, { "value": "vocational", "apiKey": "VOC", "labelEn": "Vocational school / junior college / vocational training" }, { "value": "bachelor", "apiKey": "BA", "labelEn": "University (bachelor's level)" }, { "value": "graduate", "apiKey": "GRAD", "labelEn": "Graduate school (master's / doctoral level)" } ] }, { "field": "industrySector", "apiQueryKey": "Industry", "description": "Aggregated industry sector (ISIC-based).", "requiredForCohortGate": false, "requiredForAiConsultationWizard": true, "optional": true, "enumValues": [ { "value": "agricultureForestryFishing", "apiKey": "A", "labelEn": "Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing" }, { "value": "miningManufacturingUtilities", "apiKey": "B_E", "labelEn": "Mining, Manufacturing, Utilities" }, { "value": "construction", "apiKey": "F", "labelEn": "Construction" }, { "value": "wholesaleRetailTransportHospitality", "apiKey": "G_I", "labelEn": "Wholesale, Retail, Trade, Transport, Accommodation and Food" }, { "value": "informationCommunication", "apiKey": "J", "labelEn": "Information and Communication" }, { "value": "financialInsuranceRealEstateProfessional", "apiKey": "K_M", "labelEn": "Financial, Insurance, Real Estate, Professional and Technical" }, { "value": "publicAdminEducationHealthSocial", "apiKey": "N_Q", "labelEn": "Public Administration, Education, Human Health and Social Work" }, { "value": "otherServicesArtsEntertainmentHousehold", "apiKey": "R_U", "labelEn": "Other Services, Arts, Entertainment, Personal and Household" } ] }, { "field": "occupationCategory", "apiQueryKey": "Occupation", "description": "Aggregated occupation category (ISCO-based).", "requiredForCohortGate": false, "requiredForAiConsultationWizard": true, "optional": true, "enumValues": [ { "value": "managers", "apiKey": "01", "labelEn": "Managers" }, { "value": "professionals", "apiKey": "02", "labelEn": "Professionals" }, { "value": "techniciansAndAssociateProfessionals", "apiKey": "03", "labelEn": "Technicians and Associate Professionals" }, { "value": "clericalSupportWorkers", "apiKey": "04", "labelEn": "Clerical Support Workers" }, { "value": "serviceAndSalesWorkers", "apiKey": "05", "labelEn": "Service and Sales Workers" }, { "value": "skilledAgriculturalForestryFisheryWorkers", "apiKey": "06", "labelEn": "Skilled Agricultural, Forestry and Fishery Workers" }, { "value": "craftAndRelatedTradesWorkers", "apiKey": "07", "labelEn": "Craft and Related Trades Workers" }, { "value": "plantAndMachineOperatorsAndAssemblers", "apiKey": "08", "labelEn": "Plant and Machine Operators and Assemblers" }, { "value": "elementaryOccupations", "apiKey": "09", "labelEn": "Elementary Occupations" }, { "value": "armedForcesOccupations", "apiKey": "10", "labelEn": "Armed Forces Occupations" }, { "value": "homemakers", "apiKey": "11", "labelEn": "Homemakers" }, { "value": "students", "apiKey": "12", "labelEn": "Students" }, { "value": "unemployedOrOthers", "apiKey": "13", "labelEn": "Unemployed / Others" } ] } ] }, "demographicsProfileFields": [ { "field": "countryAlpha2", "apiQueryKey": "Country", "description": "ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 country of residence. Mapped to a macro region for sparse-data analytics." }, { "field": "ageBand", "apiQueryKey": "AgeBand", "description": "Ordinal age band." }, { "field": "gender", "apiQueryKey": "Gender", "description": "Gender (analytics)." }, { "field": "residenceArea", "apiQueryKey": "ResidenceArea", "description": "Two-level urbanization band under the selected country. Neutral wording: large metro area vs mid-size city, town, or other." }, { "field": "familyStructure", "apiQueryKey": "Family", "description": "Household / family structure." }, { "field": "childrenCount", "apiQueryKey": "ChildrenCount", "description": "Number of dependent children when family structure implies children." }, { "field": "employmentType", "apiQueryKey": "Employment", "description": "Primary employment / activity type." }, { "field": "educationLevel", "apiQueryKey": "Education", "description": "Highest completed education level." }, { "field": "industrySector", "apiQueryKey": "Industry", "description": "Aggregated industry sector (ISIC-based)." }, { "field": "occupationCategory", "apiQueryKey": "Occupation", "description": "Aggregated occupation category (ISCO-based)." } ], "appExperience": { "uiLocales": [ "ja", "en", "zh", "es", "hi", "ar", "pt", "fr", "ru", "ko" ], "questionnaireLocales": { "fullLocalizedBanks": [ "ja", "en", "zh", "es", "hi", "ar", "pt", "fr", "ru", "ko" ], "machineReadableInSpecJson": [ "ja", "en", "zh" ], "authoritativeForExternalAi": "en", "note": "The running app serves a full translated question bank per UI language. This JSON spec embeds ja, en, and zh only; use en for external verification and AI ingestion via /about/." }, "assessmentFlow": { "steps": [ "Intro explainer (what PFI is and is not)", "Cohort gate: anonymous profile basics (5 required fields; residence area and children count optional)", "24 questions (A / B / C per item; strict N/A when objectively not applicable)", "Optional subjective wellbeing gate (1–5, excluded from index)", "Result screen" ], "subjectiveWellbeing": { "includedInIndex": false, "scale": "1 (not at all) to 5 (very much)", "questionEn": "Setting freedom aside for a moment, do you feel your current life is happy?", "note": "Shown after the 24 questions. Skippable. May be sent once as anonymous aggregate stats (SubjectiveWellbeing API field)." } }, "resultScreen": { "sections": [ "Personal Freedom Indicator score (0–100) and tier label (C / B / A / S)", "Per-dimension score breakdown (6 tags: economic, time, place, health, relationships, organization)", "Self-analysis report: per-question cards with chosen option and annotation" ], "notOnResultScreen": [ "Anonymous profile form is not shown on the main result scroll; it appears inside the AI consultation wizard (step 1: profile).", "Percentile / cohort comparison hero (disabled in current MVP UI)" ], "primaryAction": "After score overview and caution notice: open the share/consult hub (\"Share or consult\" card). Choose plain result copy for SNS or the 3-step AI consultation wizard." }, "aiConsultationFeature": { "referenceUrl": "https://personal-freedom-indicator.pages.dev/about/", "purpose": "Build a copy-paste prompt for an external LLM. The prompt header instructs the LLM to load /about/ first for full question text, scoring, categories, and annotations—keeping mobile prompts short.", "wizardSteps": [ { "step": "1", "id": "profile", "titleEn": "Anonymous profile", "description": "Summary with optional edit. Education, industry, and occupation are required before continuing. Cohort basics can be edited here." }, { "step": "2", "id": "consult", "titleEn": "Consultation task", "description": "Pick one of 13 task templates (none selected by default)." }, { "step": "3", "id": "preview", "titleEn": "Confirm and copy", "description": "Full prompt preview (title, rules, fixed data bundle, task). Optional edit before copying to clipboard." } ], "defaultPromptIncludes": [ "Link to /about/ and consultation rules (cite full question prompt text in AI replies, not Q id alone)", "Selected task body", "Personal Freedom Indicator score and tier", "Category breakdown (points per dimension)", "Anonymous profile summary", "Per-question answer summary (compact Q:id:choice; full prompts on /about/)", "User notes per question (when provided)" ], "taskIds": [ "counterfactualScenario", "thirdPartyPerspective", "futureFreedomPrediction", "freedomTradeoffs", "cohortAverageComparison", "customProfileSimulation", "sRankStructureComparison", "hiddenPrerequisites", "residenceAreaInversion", "genderInversion", "tierStructureExamples", "figureFreedomSimulation", "fictionFreedomContrast", "freedomHappinessMismatchExamples", "sameScoreDifferentIndustry" ], "statsSubmission": "When the wizard opens, anonymous stats (score + profile snapshot) may be sent once per session via a configured webhook." } }, "questionsByLocale": { "ja": [ { "id": 1, "categoryIndex": 0, "prompt": "生活のための収入のうち、いちばん大きいひとつの源泉が占める割合は、およそ何％ですか？", "sample": "給与、事業収入、配偶者・家族の収入、年金、家賃収入、役務報酬、配当・利息、その他", "optionA": "50%未満（複数の柱がある）", "optionB": "50%〜79%", "optionC": "90%以上（ほぼ単一の源泉に依存）", "annotation": "【理論】家計・労働経済学：収入の集中リスク（単一依存）と脆弱性。【参照】id:2は固定支出比率、id:3は収入ゼロ時のバッファ期間。本設問は源泉の分散度。【運用】50%未満／50〜79%／90%以上。低いほど自由度が高い側。" }, { "id": 2, "categoryIndex": 0, "prompt": "月々の手取り収入に対する「固定支出」の割合は、およそ何％ですか？", "sample": "家賃、食費、各種ローン、返済、医療、学費、仕送り、介護、水道光熱、通信費、その他", "optionA": "40%未満", "optionB": "40%〜69%", "optionC": "70%以上", "annotation": "【理論】行動経済学・稀缺性（scarcity）：金融ストレスと認知資源の圧迫。【参照】欧州統計の住宅費負担率は可処分所得の40%超を住宅費が占む状態を定義する。本設問は住宅に限らず固定支出全体へ広げ、先進国の生活コスト圧迫帯の参考線として読む。【運用】40%未満／40〜69%／70%以上。先進国の家計実態に合わせた三区分。低いほど自由度が高い側。" }, { "id": 3, "categoryIndex": 0, "prompt": "すべての収入が急に途切れたとき、無理なく今の生活レベルが維持できるのは、およそどれくらいですか？", "sample": "現金、普通預金、すぐ現金化できる金融資産（すぐに処分できない不動産などの資産は除く）、その他", "optionA": "6ヶ月以上", "optionB": "3ヶ月以上〜6ヶ月未満", "optionC": "3ヶ月未満", "annotation": "【理論】マクロ家計・労働経済学：予備的貯蓄、ジョブ・サーチ理論。【参照】すべての収入が途切れた想定で、無理なく現生活水準を維持できる期間（流動資産・バッファ）。先進国の家計調査は数か月分の流動資産を指標とする。FP実務でも3〜6か月分が生活防衛資金の目安。【運用】6か月以上／3〜6か月未満／3か月未満。長いほど自由度が高い側。" }, { "id": 4, "categoryIndex": 0, "prompt": "生活や仕事で必須なものが急に使えなくなったとき、あなたの状況に最も近いのはどれですか？", "sample": "インターネット、PC（会社支給含む）、スマートフォン、SNSアカウント停止、メール、決済、移動手段（車、電車、バスなど）、医療へのアクセス、道具（調理器具、楽器、工具など）、その他", "optionA": "いずれもすぐに代わりを用意できるため、深刻な影響は出ない", "optionB": "すぐには深刻な影響は出ないが、長引くと生活・健康・収入に明らかな影響がある", "optionC": "代替の手段が用意できず、見通しも立たず、その日から生活・健康・収入に影響がある", "annotation": "【理論】信頼性工学・組織論：システム冗長性、単一障害点（SPOF）。【参照】代替＝本人が待たずに実質同用途を続けられる別手段。【運用】A即時代替可／B長引くと損失／C当日から影響。多いほど自由度が高い側。" }, { "id": 5, "categoryIndex": 2, "prompt": "他の地域や国に移る理由ができた場合、最短でどのくらいで移動できますか？", "sample": "退職・引き継ぎ、賃貸解約、不動産売却、荷造り、不用品処分、家族の転校、医療の切り替え、その他", "optionA": "1ヶ月以内", "optionB": "1〜3ヶ月", "optionC": "3ヶ月超、または事実上極めて困難", "annotation": "【理論】地域・都市経済学：居住地選択、移動摩擦、離脱コスト。【参照】先進国の雇用・賃貸・学校調整では通知・準備が数週間〜数か月に分布しやすい。【運用】1ヶ月以内／1〜3ヶ月／3ヶ月超または事実上困難。短いほど自由度が高い側。" }, { "id": 6, "categoryIndex": 2, "prompt": "いま結んでいる主要な契約を、トラブルなく終了したり払い終わるまで、最短でどのくらいかかりますか？", "sample": "雇用、賃貸、住宅・自動車等のローン返済、事業契約、保険、その他", "optionA": "1ヶ月以内", "optionB": "2〜3ヶ月", "optionC": "4か月以上", "annotation": "【理論】取引コスト経済学：契約ロックイン、離脱コスト（exit cost）。【参照】雇用・賃貸・ローン返済・年契約では1〜3か月の通知・解約猶予が実務上多い。【運用】1ヶ月以内／2〜3ヶ月／4か月以上。短いほど自由度が高い側。" }, { "id": 7, "categoryIndex": 0, "prompt": "トラブルなどで重要な肩書きや、組織への所属、血縁関係を失った時、個人の能力や実績だけで生活や収入をどれほど維持できますか？", "sample": "想定：資格剥奪、解雇、除名、勘当、絶縁、離婚、破門、在留失効、その他\n代替案：専門知識・技術（語学、撮影、調理、プログラミングなど）、特許・印税、SNS・ブログ発信、創作（執筆・音楽・芸術など）、その他", "optionA": "ほぼ現状どおり維持できる。または現在の生活は、肩書きや血縁には依存していない", "optionB": "5〜8割程度は維持できる見込みがある", "optionC": "他の実績がほぼ無く、社会的肩書きを失うと、生活の見通しが立たなくなる", "annotation": "【理論】労働・人的資本経済学：社会的肩書き（組織・資格・血縁等）への単一依存と、可搬なスキル・個人実績。【参照】トラブル等で肩書き・所属・血縁を失う想定。給与停止の有無ではなく、それ以外で生活・収入を維持できる見通し。sampleの想定は喪失の例、代替案は組織・属性に頼らない柱の例。【運用】Aほぼ維持または肩書き・血縁に非依存／B5〜8割程度を維持できる見込みあり／C他実績ほぼなく見通しが立たない。高いほど自由度が高い側。" }, { "id": 8, "categoryIndex": 2, "prompt": "住所や仕事を自由に選べない原因になっている、次のような制約はいくつありますか？", "sample": "就労ビザ、在留資格、軍務、公職、保護観察、執行猶予、出国禁止命令、条件付きの奨学金、助成金、伝統的・宗教的な居住区制限、その他", "optionA": "0個（ほぼ自由）", "optionB": "1個（手続きはあるが可能）", "optionC": "2個以上（事実上困難）", "annotation": "【理論】公共行政学：行政負担、制度的制約の重複。【参照】同一の移動・就労を縛る制度は1個と数える。【運用】0個／1個／2個以上。少ないほど自由度が高い側。" }, { "id": 9, "categoryIndex": 2, "prompt": "自分が自由に使える時間は、1日平均でどれくらいありますか？", "sample": "趣味、勉強、運動、雑談、休息など\n家事、育児、介護、睡眠、食事、入浴、仕事、通勤等は自由時間に含めない", "optionA": "5時間以上", "optionB": "2時間以上〜5時間未満", "optionC": "2時間未満", "annotation": "【理論】時間利用社会学：義務・強制から解放された裁量時間（discretionary time）。【参照】タイムユースの裁量・義務対比；設問は主観の1日平均（土日を含む週÷7でも可）。【運用】5時間以上／2時間以上5時間未満／2時間未満。多いほど自由度が高い側。" }, { "id": 10, "categoryIndex": 2, "prompt": "家事や介護など、生活を維持する作業のうち、外注や自動化の余裕がなく、自分でやらざるを得ないと感じる割合は、およそ何％ですか？", "sample": "家事代行、ロボット掃除機、食洗機、乾燥機、介護、保育、シッター、フードデリバリー、クリーニング、ネットスーパー、その他", "optionA": "30%未満", "optionB": "30%〜79%", "optionC": "80%以上", "annotation": "【理論】行動経済学・時間の購入：外的制約としての自担義務。【参照】所得等で利用困難は環境要因。主観的「やらざるを得ない」で測る。【運用】30%未満／30〜79%／80%以上。少ないほど自由度が高い側。" }, { "id": 11, "categoryIndex": 3, "prompt": "過去1年間、健康上の理由で「予定していた活動」をキャンセルまたは大きく変更した日は、合計で何日ありましたか？", "sample": "仕事、通院、運動、旅行、趣味の予定など、その他", "optionA": "0日", "optionB": "1〜5日", "optionC": "6日以上", "annotation": "【理論】公衆衛生・健康関連QOL：活動制限日数。【参照】id:13は仮定シナリオの取りやめ可能確率。【運用】0日／1〜5日／6日以上。少ないほど自由度が高い側。" }, { "id": 12, "categoryIndex": 2, "prompt": "できるだけ集中したい仕事中や勉強中に、すぐ反応を求められ、中断せざるを得ない割り込みは、平均して1時間に何回ありますか？", "sample": "家族の呼び出し、チャット、電話、来客など、その他", "optionA": "1回以下", "optionB": "2〜3回", "optionC": "4回以上", "annotation": "【理論】認知科学・HCI：割り込み、タスク再開コスト。【参照】Gloria Markらの中断研究（約23分/回）を運用参考。【運用】1回以下／2〜3回／4回以上。少ないほど自由度が高い側。" }, { "id": 13, "categoryIndex": 3, "prompt": "体調不良や急な用事がその朝起きたと仮定したとき、その日の予定をすべて取りやめられる確率は、およそどれですか？", "sample": "出勤（有休・代休で取りやめ可能なら含む）、会議、習い事、任意の会食、送迎、その他", "optionA": "90%以上", "optionB": "50%〜89%", "optionC": "50%未満（ほぼ常に不可、または事後処理のコストが大きすぎる）", "annotation": "【理論】公衆衛生・労働社会学：スケジュール・コントロール。【参照】id:11は健康による実績変更日数。【運用】90%以上／50〜89%／50%未満。多いほど自由度が高い側。" }, { "id": 14, "categoryIndex": 2, "prompt": "仕事の始業時間や家族/同居人の生活リズムに合わせて、就寝・起床の時刻を合わせる必要がある日は、週におおよそ何日ありますか？", "sample": "仕事の始業時間、オンコール・夜間連絡、家族・同居人の生活リズム、その他", "optionA": "週1日以下", "optionB": "週2〜5日", "optionC": "週6日以上", "annotation": "【理論】時間社会学：社会的時差・時間的制約。【参照】id:13は予定の取消可能日数；本設問は睡眠・起床の時刻同期（予定の有無ではない）。【運用】週1日以下／2〜5日／6日以上。少ないほど自由度が高い側。" }, { "id": 15, "categoryIndex": 4, "prompt": "気の乗らない集まりに誘われたり、勧誘・セールスを受けたとき、いつもに近いのはどれですか？", "sample": "飲み会、同窓・冠婚葬祭、MLM/ネットワークビジネス・宗教勧誘、保険・美容、訪問販売、その他", "optionA": "だいたい断る（相手を問わず、無理な誘いは断る）", "optionB": "状況や相手によっては、断らず受け入れる", "optionC": "断れず、参加や契約に流されることが多い", "annotation": "【理論】社会心理学・行動経済学：他律・同調圧への初動（消極的自由）。【参照】旧版の衝動購入・24時間決定は自律帯のためコア外；本設問は外的圧力のため指数コアに含む。断り方（直接・遠回し）は問わない。【運用】だいたい断る／状況で受け入れる／流されやすい。Aが高・Cが低い側。" }, { "id": 16, "categoryIndex": 0, "prompt": "多くのお金や時間を費やした対象のうち、いまも未練や義務感が残り、行動や判断を縛っているものはありますか？", "sample": "赤字事業、学校、課金ゲーム、将来性のない交際、成果のない習い事、未完の創作物、含み損の大きい投資、使っていないブランド物、問題のある身内、その他", "optionA": "該当なし（大きく投資した対象自体がない場合も含む）", "optionB": "1つ", "optionC": "2つ以上", "annotation": "【理論】行動経済学：埋没費・執着・ロックイン。【参照】過去の選択への縛り（消極的自由）。【運用】該当なし／1つ／2つ以上。少ないほど自由度が高い側。" }, { "id": 17, "categoryIndex": 3, "prompt": "金銭的・医学的な制限を除き、いつ・何を食べるかを自分で決められた割合は、およそ何％ですか？", "sample": "会食・接待、家族の献立、制限食・病院食、ダイエット・指導者の食事ルール、宗教上の禁忌、アレルギー対応（医学的）、その他", "optionA": "80%以上", "optionB": "30%〜79%", "optionC": "30%未満", "annotation": "【理論】食行動科学：食事裁量（タイミング×内容）。【参照】金銭・医学的制約は対象外。本設問は「決められた％」のため高いほど自由度が高い（他の制約％設問と採点向きが逆）。【運用】80%以上／30〜79%／30%未満。" }, { "id": 18, "categoryIndex": 3, "prompt": "やめたいのにいまも止められず、生活に深刻な影響のある習慣や依存状態は、いくつありますか？", "sample": "禁煙、禁酒、SNS、ゲーム、ギャンブル、スマホ依存、動画視聴、散財、成人向けコンテンツ、不健全な人間関係、その他", "optionA": "該当なし", "optionB": "1つ", "optionC": "2つ以上", "annotation": "【理論】習慣科学・依存：内的制約が実害化した状態。【参照】指数コア。外的他律ではなく自己制御の失敗帯だが、自由の実質に影響。【運用】該当なし／1つ／2つ以上（いずれも「やめたいのに止められず、生活に深刻な影響あり」に限定）。少ないほど自由度が高い側。" }, { "id": 19, "categoryIndex": 4, "prompt": "精神的・時間的・経済的な搾取や悪影響を与えている人物との関係について、あなたの状況に最も近いのはどれですか？", "sample": "モラルハラスメント、搾取的な関係、縁切り、連絡先ブロック、洗脳、マインドコントロール、その他", "optionA": "該当する関係がない", "optionB": "該当はあるが、ほぼいつも遮断・離脱できる／一部の関係だけ・ときどきできる", "optionC": "ほとんどできない（やめたい関係が残っている）", "annotation": "【理論】家族社会学・社会心理学：関係からの離脱コスト。【参照】id:7は肩書き・組織、id:16は物・事業、本設問は人物関係。【運用】該当なし／一部・可／ほとんど不可。多いほど自由度が高い側。" }, { "id": 20, "categoryIndex": 5, "prompt": "所属する会社や組織、コミュニティで、自分では変えられない窮屈なルールや慣習について、あなたに最も近いのはどれですか？", "sample": "仕事の進め方、メンバー管理、休憩のタイミング、有給取得、同調残業、理不尽・非効率なルール、時代遅れのツール、オフィス出勤、服装/身だしなみ規定、ノルマ、勤務時間の細かい指定、待機・オンコール時間、立ち入り禁止場所、交友の制限、その他", "optionA": "ほとんど窮屈さを感じない（必要最低限のルール・慣習のみ）", "optionB": "一部の場面やルールで、ときどき窮屈さを感じる", "optionC": "複数の場面で繰り返し窮屈さを感じる、または1つでも仕事や所属に大きく影響する", "annotation": "【理論】産業・組織心理学：職務統制・組織規範（職務裁量の裏返し）。【参照】id:19は人物関係。本設問は会社・組織・コミュニティのルール・慣習；％ではなく及び方・影響の程度で三区分。【運用】ほとんど感じない／一部でときどき／複数または大きな影響。少ないほど自由度が高い側。" }, { "id": 21, "categoryIndex": 0, "prompt": "自分で稼いだ資産のうち、配偶者・家族・組織などに使い道を指示・制限されている割合は、およそ何％ですか？", "sample": "共同口座のルール、家計の承認、組織・宗教・家族の規範、仕送り・税金以外の用途制限など、その他", "optionA": "30%未満", "optionB": "30%〜79%", "optionC": "80%以上", "annotation": "【理論】家計社会学：家計内資源配分の制約。【参照】裁量資金の裏返し。【運用】30%未満／30〜79%／80%以上。少ないほど自由度が高い側。" }, { "id": 22, "categoryIndex": 5, "prompt": "会社や組織、コミュニティで、誰かが多数派や組織・コミュニティの方針に反対したとき、その人が陰口・無視・評価低下などの仕打ち（報復）を受ける確率は？", "sample": "減給、降格、解雇、物理/精神的な追放、勘当、暴力や身体的拘束、訴訟、罰金など、その他", "optionA": "10%未満（事実上ペナルティなし）", "optionB": "10%〜50%（時々ペナルティがある）", "optionC": "51%以上（高確率で報復を受ける）", "annotation": "【理論】組織心理学：心理的安全性、報復恐怖。【参照】報復確率の自己申告。【運用】10%未満／10〜50%／51%以上。低いほど自由度が高い側。" }, { "id": 23, "categoryIndex": 4, "prompt": "重要な決定をするとき、誰かの承認や同意がなければ進められないものは、およそ何％ですか？", "sample": "職業、学業、転職、離職、住居、高額決済、結婚/離婚/交際、妊娠/出産、起業、その他", "optionA": "10%未満", "optionB": "10%〜50%", "optionC": "51%以上", "annotation": "【理論】家族社会学・組織論：他者による決定制約。【参照】指数コア。相談のみ・礼儀的確認は除く。id:21は資産用途。Cat4（関係・集団）。【運用】10%未満／10〜50%／51%以上。少ないほど自由度が高い側。" }, { "id": 24, "categoryIndex": 3, "prompt": "体調が悪いとき、必要な医療（受診・検査・薬・処置）を、金銭・移動・時間の面で妨げられずに受けられる状況に、あなたの状況に最も近いのはどれですか？", "sample": "通院の交通・保育、夜間・休日診、保険・自己負担、処方の継続、専門医の予約待ち、勤務時間との兼ね合い、その他", "optionA": "ほぼ妨げられない", "optionB": "ときどき遅れる・諦めることがある", "optionC": "よく遅れる・諦める・受けられない", "annotation": "【理論】医療アクセス・健康格差：金銭・移動・時間的障壁。【参照】id:4は手段の代替、id:11は健康による予定変更実績、id:13は予定の取りやめ。【運用】Aほぼ妨げられない／Bときどき／Cよく。多いほど自由度が高い側。" } ], "en": [ { "id": 1, "categoryIndex": 0, "prompt": "Roughly what percentage of the income you rely on for living expenses comes from your single largest source?", "sample": "Salary, business income, spouse or family income, pension, rent income, fees, dividends or interest, other", "optionA": "Under 50% (multiple pillars)", "optionB": "50%-79%", "optionC": "90% or more (mostly one source)", "annotation": "[Theory] Household & labor economics: income concentration risk. [Ref] id:2 fixed-expense share; id:3 runway if all income stops. This item is source diversification. [Ops] Under 50% / 50%-79% / 90%+; lower is higher freedom." }, { "id": 2, "categoryIndex": 0, "prompt": "Roughly what percentage of your take-home income goes to fixed spending?", "sample": "Rent, food, various loans, repayments, health insurance, tuition, remittances, caregiving, utilities, telecom, other", "optionA": "Under 40%", "optionB": "40%-69%", "optionC": "70% or more", "annotation": "[Theory] Behavioral economics & scarcity: financial stress and cognitive load. [Ref] European housing-cost statistics define a burden when housing alone exceeds 40% of disposable income; this item extends to all fixed spending. [Ops] Under 40% / 40%-69% / 70%+; lower is higher freedom." }, { "id": 3, "categoryIndex": 0, "prompt": "If all income stopped suddenly, about how long could you maintain your current standard of living without strain?", "sample": "Cash, checking/savings, readily liquid financial assets (excluding real estate etc. that cannot be sold quickly), other", "optionA": "6 months or more", "optionB": "3 months or more to under 6 months", "optionC": "Under 3 months", "annotation": "[Theory] Macro household & labor economics: precautionary savings. [Ref] All income stops; period you can maintain current living standard without strain (liquid buffer). Advanced-economy surveys use months of liquid assets; 3-6 months is common planning guidance. [Ops] 6+ / 3 to under 6 / under 3 months; longer is higher freedom." }, { "id": 4, "categoryIndex": 0, "prompt": "When something essential for life or work suddenly stops working, which is closest to your situation?", "sample": "Internet, PC (including employer-provided), smartphone, SNS account suspension, email, payments, transport (car, train, bus, etc.), healthcare access, tools (cooking utensils, instruments, tools, etc.), other", "optionA": "I can replace each quickly with no serious impact", "optionB": "No serious impact at first, but prolonged outage would clearly harm life, health, or income", "optionC": "No substitute and no clear outlook; life, health, or income affected that day", "annotation": "[Theory] Reliability engineering: redundancy, single points of failure. [Ops] A immediate substitute / B delayed harm / C same-day harm; higher is higher freedom." }, { "id": 5, "categoryIndex": 2, "prompt": "If you had a reason to move to another region or country, how soon could you relocate at the earliest?", "sample": "Resignation/handover, lease termination, property sale, packing, disposing unwanted items, family school transfers, healthcare switch, other", "optionA": "Within 1 month", "optionB": "1-3 months", "optionC": "Over 3 months, or practically extremely difficult", "annotation": "[Theory] Regional & urban economics: mobility friction, exit cost. [Ref] Employment, rental, and school adjustments often span weeks to months. [Ops] Within 1 month / 1-3 months / over 3 months or practically difficult; shorter is higher freedom." }, { "id": 6, "categoryIndex": 2, "prompt": "What is the shortest time to end or fully pay off your main current contracts without major trouble?", "sample": "Employment, rental, housing or auto loans, business contracts, insurance, other", "optionA": "Within 1 month", "optionB": "2-3 months", "optionC": "4 months or more", "annotation": "[Theory] Transaction-cost economics: contract lock-in, exit cost. [Ref] Notice periods of 1-3 months are common in practice. [Ops] Within 1 month / 2-3 months / 4+ months; shorter is higher freedom." }, { "id": 7, "categoryIndex": 0, "prompt": "If you lost important credentials, organizational affiliation, or family ties due to trouble, how much could you maintain your life and income with only your personal skills and track record?", "sample": "Scenarios: credential revocation, dismissal, expulsion, disownment, estrangement, divorce, excommunication, loss of residence status, other\nAlternatives: professional knowledge and skills (languages, photography, cooking, programming, etc.), patents and royalties, social media and blogging, creative work (writing, music, art, etc.), other", "optionA": "Could mostly maintain the status quo, or current life does not depend on credentials or family ties", "optionB": "Could reasonably expect to maintain roughly 50%-80% with portable skills alone", "optionC": "Little other track record; if social credentials were lost, outlook for life would be bleak", "annotation": "[Theory] Labor & human capital: dependence on social credentials (organization, licenses, family ties) vs portable skills and personal track record. [Ref] Loss of credentials, affiliation, or kin due to trouble; outlook to maintain life and income without them, not whether pay stopped. Sample scenarios = loss examples; alternatives = non-organizational pillars. [Ops] A mostly maintain or not dependent / B reasonable outlook for roughly 50%-80% / C little other track record, bleak outlook; higher is higher freedom." }, { "id": 8, "categoryIndex": 2, "prompt": "How many constraints like the following stop you from freely choosing where you live or work?", "sample": "Work visa, residence status, military service, public office, probation, travel ban, conditional scholarships or grants, traditional or religious residence rules, other", "optionA": "0 (mostly free)", "optionB": "1 (procedures exist but possible)", "optionC": "2 or more (practically very difficult)", "annotation": "[Theory] Public administration: overlapping institutional constraints. [Ops] 0 / 1 / 2+; fewer is higher freedom." }, { "id": 9, "categoryIndex": 2, "prompt": "Roughly how much time per day on average can you use freely for yourself?", "sample": "Hobbies, study, exercise, chatting, rest, etc.\nDo not count housework, childcare, caregiving, sleep, meals, bathing, work, commute, or similar toward free time.", "optionA": "5 hours or more", "optionB": "2 hours or more to under 5 hours", "optionC": "Under 2 hours", "annotation": "[Theory] Sociology of time use: discretionary time free from obligation or coercion. [Ref] Time-use discretionary vs obligation contrast; subjective daily average (week÷7 OK). [Ops] 5+ / 2 to under 5 / under 2 hours; more is higher freedom." }, { "id": 10, "categoryIndex": 2, "prompt": "Of housework, caregiving, and other tasks that keep daily life running, roughly what share do you feel you must do yourself because outsourcing or automation is not realistically available?", "sample": "Cleaning services, robot vacuum, dishwasher, dryer, care, childcare, sitters, delivery, laundry, online grocery, other", "optionA": "Under 30%", "optionB": "30%-79%", "optionC": "80% or more", "annotation": "[Theory] Behavioral economics: obligation to self-provide time. [Ref] Uses subjective \"must do yourself,\" not income alone. [Ops] Under 30% / 30%-79% / 80%+; lower is higher freedom." }, { "id": 11, "categoryIndex": 3, "prompt": "In the past year, on how many days in total did health reasons force you to cancel or greatly change planned activities?", "sample": "Work, medical visits, exercise, travel, hobby plans, other", "optionA": "0 days", "optionB": "1-5 days", "optionC": "6 days or more", "annotation": "[Theory] Public health & HRQoL: activity-limitation days. [Ref] id:13 covers hypothetical probability of canceling all plans that day. [Ops] 0 / 1-5 / 6+ days; fewer is higher freedom." }, { "id": 12, "categoryIndex": 2, "prompt": "While trying to focus on work or study, how often per hour on average must you stop for interruptions that demand an immediate response?", "sample": "Family calls, chat, phone, visitors, other", "optionA": "Once or less", "optionB": "2-3 times", "optionC": "4 times or more", "annotation": "[Theory] Cognitive science & HCI: interruption and resumption cost. [Ref] Gloria Mark-style resumption delays as operational reference. [Ops] <=1 / 2-3 / 4+ per hour; fewer is higher freedom." }, { "id": 13, "categoryIndex": 3, "prompt": "Assuming you woke up unwell or with urgent business that morning, roughly what is the probability you could cancel all plans for that day?", "sample": "Work attendance (include if paid leave or substitute day off applies), meetings, lessons, optional meals, school runs, other", "optionA": "90% or more", "optionB": "50%-89%", "optionC": "Under 50% (almost never, or cleanup cost too high)", "annotation": "[Theory] Labor sociology: schedule control. [Ref] id:11 is health-related change days actually experienced. [Ops] 90%+ / 50%-89% / under 50%; more is higher freedom." }, { "id": 14, "categoryIndex": 2, "prompt": "To match your job start times and the routines of family or housemates, on roughly how many days per week do you need to align your bedtime and wake time?", "sample": "Job start times, on-call or night contact, family or housemate routines, other", "optionA": "1 or fewer days per week", "optionB": "2-5 days per week", "optionC": "6 or more days per week", "annotation": "[Theory] Sociology of time: forced synchronization. [Ref] id:13 cancelable plans; this item sleep/wake timing sync, not plan cancellation. [Ops] <=1 / 2-5 / 6+ days; fewer is higher freedom." }, { "id": 15, "categoryIndex": 4, "prompt": "When invited to gatherings you are not keen on or approached with solicitations or sales, which is closest to your usual response?", "sample": "Drinks with colleagues, alumni or ceremonial events, MLM/network marketing or religious solicitation, insurance or beauty sales, door-to-door sales, other", "optionA": "Usually decline (unreasonable invites regardless of who asks)", "optionB": "Sometimes accept without declining, depending on situation or person", "optionC": "Often swept along into attending or signing up without declining", "annotation": "[Theory] Social/commercial pressure: default response. [Ref] Core item; prior impulse-purchase wording was autonomy-band supplementary. Decline style (direct vs indirect) not scored. [Ops] Usually decline / situational accept / often swept along; A higher freedom." }, { "id": 16, "categoryIndex": 0, "prompt": "Among things you invested a lot of money or time in, are any still binding your actions or decisions through attachment or obligation?", "sample": "Loss-making business, school, paid games, dead-end relationship, fruitless lessons, unfinished work, large unrealized losses, unused luxury goods, problematic relatives, other", "optionA": "None (including never having such a large investment)", "optionB": "One", "optionC": "Two or more", "annotation": "[Theory] Behavioral economics: sunk cost & lock-in. [Ref] Negative liberty: constraint from past commitments. [Ops] None / one / two+; fewer is higher freedom." }, { "id": 17, "categoryIndex": 3, "prompt": "Excluding financial and medical limits, roughly what percentage of the time could you decide for yourself when and what to eat?", "sample": "Work dinners and entertainment meals, family menus, prescribed or hospital meals, diet or coach/instructor meal rules, religious taboos, allergy accommodation (medical), other", "optionA": "80% or more", "optionB": "30%-79%", "optionC": "Under 30%", "annotation": "[Theory] Eating behavior science: meal discretion (timing x content). [Ref] Financial/medical excluded. Higher % decided = higher freedom (scoring direction opposite to constraint-% items). [Ops] 80%+ / 30%-79% / under 30%." }, { "id": 18, "categoryIndex": 3, "prompt": "How many habits or dependencies do you still cannot stop despite wanting to, that seriously affect your daily life?", "sample": "Smoking, alcohol, SNS, games, gambling, phone/video overuse, overspending, adult content, unhealthy relationships, other", "optionA": "None", "optionB": "One", "optionC": "Two or more", "annotation": "[Theory] Habit science & dependence: internal constraints with real cost. [Ref] Index core. [Ops] None / one / two+ (only if you cannot stop and life is seriously affected); fewer is higher freedom." }, { "id": 19, "categoryIndex": 4, "prompt": "Regarding relationships with people who exploit you or harm you mentally, in time, or economically, which is closest to your situation?", "sample": "Moral harassment, exploitative ties, cutting contact, blocking, brainwashing, mind control, other", "optionA": "No such relationship", "optionB": "Some apply, but I can usually cut off or leave / only some relationships / only sometimes", "optionC": "Almost cannot (unwanted relationships remain)", "annotation": "[Theory] Family & social psychology: exit cost from relationships. [Ref] id:7 organization/title; id:16 objects/projects; this item is interpersonal. [Ops] None / partial / almost cannot; higher is higher freedom." }, { "id": 20, "categoryIndex": 5, "prompt": "In the company, organization, or community you belong to, which is closest regarding cramped rules or customs you cannot realistically change yourself?", "sample": "How work is done, team/member management, when breaks are allowed, taking paid leave, staying late with the group, unfair or inefficient rules, outdated tools, mandatory office attendance, dress/grooming rules, quotas, detailed work-hour rules, standby or on-call time, off-limits areas, restrictions on personal associations, other", "optionA": "Hardly feel cramped (only necessary minimum rules or customs)", "optionB": "Feel cramped sometimes in some situations or rules", "optionC": "Feel cramped repeatedly in many situations, or at least one rule substantially affects work or belonging", "annotation": "[Theory] Industrial & organizational psychology: job control & organizational norms. [Ref] id:19 interpersonal; this item is org rules/customs; ordinal by reach/impact, not percent. [Ops] Hardly / sometimes in part / repeated or substantial impact; higher is higher freedom." }, { "id": 21, "categoryIndex": 0, "prompt": "Of assets you earned yourself, roughly what percentage have their use directed or restricted by spouse, family, or organization?", "sample": "Joint-account rules, household approval, family or religious norms, uses besides remittances and tax, other", "optionA": "Under 30%", "optionB": "30%-79%", "optionC": "80% or more", "annotation": "[Theory] Household sociology: constrained discretionary assets. [Ref] Inverse of discretionary funds. [Ops] Under 30% / 30%-79% / 80%+; lower is higher freedom." }, { "id": 22, "categoryIndex": 5, "prompt": "In your company, organization, or community, when someone opposes the majority or organizational or community policy, what is the probability they face retaliation such as gossip, shunning, or lower evaluations?", "sample": "Pay cut, demotion, dismissal, physical/psychological exclusion, disownment, violence or restraint, lawsuit, fines, other", "optionA": "Under 10% (virtually no penalty)", "optionB": "10%-50% (penalties sometimes occur)", "optionC": "51% or more (high probability of retaliation)", "annotation": "[Theory] Organizational psychology: psychological safety & fear of retaliation. [Ops] Under 10% / 10%-50% / 51%+; lower is higher freedom." }, { "id": 23, "categoryIndex": 4, "prompt": "For important decisions, roughly what percentage cannot proceed without someone else's approval or consent?", "sample": "Career, study, job change, leaving job, housing, large payments, marriage/divorce/dating, pregnancy/birth, starting a business, other", "optionA": "Under 10%", "optionB": "10%-50%", "optionC": "51% or more", "annotation": "[Theory] Family sociology & organizations: others' gatekeeping on decisions. [Ref] Index core. Exclude courtesy-only consultation. id:21 asset use. [Ops] Under 10% / 10%-50% / 51%+; lower is higher freedom." }, { "id": 24, "categoryIndex": 3, "prompt": "When you are unwell, how close is your situation to being able to receive needed medical care (visits, tests, medication, procedures) without barriers from money, travel, or time?", "sample": "Commute to clinics, childcare, night/weekend care, insurance and out-of-pocket costs, prescription continuity, specialist wait times, work hours, other", "optionA": "Rarely blocked", "optionB": "Sometimes delayed or I give up", "optionC": "Often delayed, I give up, or cannot access care", "annotation": "[Theory] Healthcare access & barriers: financial, mobility, temporal. [Ref] id:4 substitutes, id:11 health cancellations, id:13 schedule control. [Ops] A rarely / B sometimes / C often; higher is higher freedom." } ], "zh": [ { "id": 1, "categoryIndex": 0, "prompt": "生活所需收入中，最大单一来源约占百分之几？", "sample": "工资、经营收入、配偶或家人收入、养老金、租金、劳务报酬、股息・利息、其他", "optionA": "50%以下（多来源）", "optionB": "50%〜79%", "optionC": "90%以上（几乎单一来源）", "annotation": "【理论】家计与劳动经济学：收入集中风险。【参照】id:2为固定支出比；id:3为收入中断缓冲期。本题为来源分散度。【运用】50%以下／50〜79%／90%以上；越低越偏自由。" }, { "id": 2, "categoryIndex": 0, "prompt": "每月实得收入中，「固定支出」大约占百分之几？", "sample": "房租、伙食、各类贷款、还款、医疗保险、学费、汇款、照护、水电燃气、通信费等", "optionA": "40%以下", "optionB": "40%〜69%", "optionC": "70%以上", "annotation": "【理论】行为经济学与稀缺性：金融压力与认知资源占用。【参照】欧洲住房成本统计将住房占可支配收入40%以上定义为负担；本题扩展至全部固定支出。【运用】40%以下／40〜69%／70%以上；越低越偏自由。" }, { "id": 3, "categoryIndex": 0, "prompt": "若所有收入突然中断，在不勉强的情况下，大约能维持当前生活水平多久？", "sample": "现金、活期存款、可迅速变现的金融资产（不含难以快速出售的不动产等）", "optionA": "6个月以上", "optionB": "3个月以上至不足6个月", "optionC": "不足3个月", "annotation": "【理论】宏观家计与劳动经济学：预防性储蓄。【参照】所有收入中断的设想；不勉强维持当前生活水平的期间（流动资产缓冲）。【运用】6个月以上／3〜6个月未満／不足3个月；越长越偏自由。" }, { "id": 4, "categoryIndex": 0, "prompt": "生活或工作中必需的事物突然无法使用时，哪种情况最接近你？", "sample": "互联网、电脑（含公司配发）、手机、社交账号停用、邮件、支付、移动手段（汽车、电车、公交等）、就医、工具（厨具、乐器、工具等）、其他", "optionA": "都能迅速替代，无严重影响", "optionB": "短期无严重影响，但拖延会明显损害生活、健康或收入", "optionC": "无法替代且看不到前景，当天起就受影响", "annotation": "【理论】可靠性工程：冗余与单点故障。【运用】A即时替代／B拖延则损／C当日受影响；越高越偏自由。" }, { "id": 5, "categoryIndex": 2, "prompt": "若出现迁往其他地区或国家的理由，最短多久可以完成搬迁？", "sample": "离职交接、退租、卖房、子女转学、医疗衔接等", "optionA": "1个月以内", "optionB": "1〜3个月", "optionC": "超过3个月，或事实上极为困难", "annotation": "【理论】区域与都市经济学：迁移摩擦、离脱成本。【运用】1个月以内／1〜3个月／超过3个月或事实上困难；越短越偏自由。" }, { "id": 6, "categoryIndex": 2, "prompt": "要顺利结束或付清目前主要合同，最短大约需要多久？", "sample": "雇佣、租赁、房贷或车贷、商业合同、保险等", "optionA": "1个月以内", "optionB": "2〜3个月", "optionC": "4个月以上", "annotation": "【理论】交易成本经济学：合同锁定、离脱成本。【运用】1个月以内／2〜3个月／4个月以上；越短越偏自由。" }, { "id": 7, "categoryIndex": 0, "prompt": "若因变故而失去重要的头衔、组织归属或血缘关系，仅凭个人能力与实绩，能在多大程度上维持当前的生活与收入？", "sample": "想定：资格吊销、解雇、除名、断绝关系、绝缘、离婚、破門、在留失效等\n替代案：专业知识・技能（语言、摄影、烹饪、编程等）、专利・版税、自媒体・博客发文、创作（写作、音乐、艺术等）、其他", "optionA": "基本能维持现状，或当前生活并不依赖头衔与血缘", "optionB": "有理由认为大约能维持五到八成", "optionC": "几乎没有其他实绩，失去社会性头衔后生活前景渺茫", "annotation": "【理论】劳动与人力资本：对社会性头衔（组织・资格・血缘等）的单一依赖与可迁移技能・个人实绩。【参照】因变故而失去头衔・归属・血缘的设想；问的是维持生活与收入的展望，而非工资是否停止。sample中想定=丧失例，替代案=不依赖组织・属性的支柱例。【运用】A基本维持或非依赖／B约有五到八成维持的展望／C几乎无其他实绩、前景渺茫；越高越偏自由。" }, { "id": 8, "categoryIndex": 2, "prompt": "下列原因中有几项使你难以自由选择居住地或工作？", "sample": "工作签证、在留资格、兵役、公职、保护观察、出境限制、附带条件的奖学金或补助、传统或宗教居住限制等", "optionA": "0项（基本自由）", "optionB": "1项（有程序但可行）", "optionC": "2项以上（事实上很困难）", "annotation": "【理论】公共行政：制度性约束重叠。【运用】0／1／2项以上；越少越偏自由。" }, { "id": 9, "categoryIndex": 2, "prompt": "平均每天可以自由支配的时间大约有多少？", "sample": "爱好、学习、运动、闲聊、休息等\n不计家务、育儿、照护、睡眠、用餐、洗澡、工作、通勤等", "optionA": "5小时以上", "optionB": "2小时以上至不足5小时", "optionC": "不足2小时", "annotation": "【理论】时间利用社会学：从义务与强制中解放出来的裁量时间（discretionary time）。【参照】时间利用调查中的裁量与义务对比；本题为自觉的一天平均（含周末的周÷7亦可）。【运用】5小时以上／2小时以上至不足5小时／不足2小时；越多越偏自由。" }, { "id": 10, "categoryIndex": 2, "prompt": "在家务、照护等维持日常生活的作业中，约有几成因难以外包或自动化而「不得不自己做」？", "sample": "家政、扫地机器人、洗碗机、烘干机、照护、保育、外卖、洗衣、网超、其他", "optionA": "30%以下", "optionB": "30%〜79%", "optionC": "80%以上", "annotation": "【理论】行为经济学：自担义务的主观约束。【参照】以「不得不」的主观感受测量，不单看收入。【运用】30%以下／30〜79%／80%以上；越少越偏自由。" }, { "id": 11, "categoryIndex": 3, "prompt": "过去一年内，因健康原因取消或大幅更改「原定活动」的天数合计多少？", "sample": "工作、就医、运动、旅行、爱好安排等", "optionA": "0天", "optionB": "1〜5天", "optionC": "6天以上", "annotation": "【理论】公共卫生与健康相关生活质量：活动受限日数。【参照】id:13为假设可取消全部安排的概率。【运用】0／1〜5／6天以上；越少越偏自由。" }, { "id": 12, "categoryIndex": 2, "prompt": "在尽量需要集中注意力的工作或学习中，平均每小时有多少次必须立即回应、不得不中断的打扰？", "sample": "家人呼叫、聊天、电话、来客等", "optionA": "1次以下", "optionB": "2〜3次", "optionC": "4次以上", "annotation": "【理论】认知科学与HCI：打断与恢复成本。【运用】1次以下／2〜3次／4次以上；越少越偏自由。" }, { "id": 13, "categoryIndex": 3, "prompt": "假设当天早晨身体不适或有急事，可以取消当天全部安排的概率大约是多少？", "sample": "出勤（含可用带薪假或调休的日子）、会议、课程、自愿聚餐、接送等", "optionA": "90%以上", "optionB": "50%〜89%", "optionC": "50%以下（几乎不可，或事后成本过高）", "annotation": "【理论】劳动社会学：日程控制。【参照】id:11为健康导致的实际更改天数。【运用】90%以上／50〜89%／50%以下；越多越偏自由。" }, { "id": 14, "categoryIndex": 2, "prompt": "为配合工作始业时间与家人/同居者的生活节奏，约每周有多少天需要调整就寝与起床时刻？", "sample": "工作始业时间、待命或夜间联系、家人/同居者生活节奏等", "optionA": "每周1天以下", "optionB": "每周2〜5天", "optionC": "每周6天以上", "annotation": "【理论】时间社会学：被迫的时间同步。【参照】id:13为可取消的预定；本题为睡眠/起床时刻同步（非预定有无）。【运用】1天以下／2〜5天／6天以上；越少越偏自由。" }, { "id": 15, "categoryIndex": 4, "prompt": "被邀参加不想去的聚会，或遇到劝诱·推销时，您通常最接近哪一种？", "sample": "酒会、同学会·红白喜事、传销/直销·宗教劝诱、保险·美容、上门推销等", "optionA": "多半会拒绝（不论对象，无理的邀请会婉拒）", "optionB": "视情况和对象，有时不拒绝就接受", "optionC": "往往没能拒绝，就被拉着参加或签约", "annotation": "【理论】社会心理学·行为经济学：他律与同调压力下的初动。【参照】指数核心。婉拒方式（直接/迂回）不记分。【运用】多半拒绝／视情况接受／易被带着走；A偏自由。" }, { "id": 16, "categoryIndex": 0, "prompt": "在你投入大量金钱或时间的对象中，是否仍有因留恋或义务感而束缚行动或判断的？", "sample": "亏损事业、学业、氪金游戏、无望恋情、无效学习、未完成作品、大额浮亏、闲置奢侈品、问题亲属等", "optionA": "没有（包括从未有过此类大额投入）", "optionB": "1项", "optionC": "2项以上", "annotation": "【理论】行为经济学：沉没成本与锁定。【参照】消极自由：过去选择的束缚。【运用】没有／1项／2项以上；越少越偏自由。" }, { "id": 17, "categoryIndex": 3, "prompt": "除金钱与医学限制外，约有几成餐食能自行决定何时、吃什么？", "sample": "应酬、家宴菜单、限制食/医院餐、节食或教练饮食规则、宗教禁忌、过敏应对（医学）、其他", "optionA": "80%以上", "optionB": "30%〜79%", "optionC": "30%以下", "annotation": "【理论】食行为科学：饮食裁量（时间×内容）。【参照】金钱/医学除外。本题为「能自行决定的％」，越高越偏自由（与约束％题采分方向相反）。【运用】80%以上／30〜79%／30%以下。" }, { "id": 18, "categoryIndex": 3, "prompt": "有多少种您想戒却至今仍戒不掉、并对生活造成严重影响的习惯或依赖？", "sample": "烟、酒、社交软件、游戏、赌博、手机/视频过度使用、挥霍、成人内容、不健康关系等", "optionA": "没有", "optionB": "1项", "optionC": "2项以上", "annotation": "【理论】习惯科学·依赖：内化约束带来实质成本。【参照】指数核心。【运用】没有／1项／2项以上（均限于想戒却戒不掉且对生活有严重影响）；越少越偏自由。" }, { "id": 19, "categoryIndex": 4, "prompt": "对在精神、时间或经济上剥削或伤害你的人际关系，哪种情况最接近你？", "sample": "职场骚扰、剥削性关系、断联、拉黑、洗脑、精神控制等", "optionA": "没有此类关系", "optionB": "有，但大多能切断或离开／仅部分关系／仅有时可以", "optionC": "几乎不能（仍留有想结束的关系）", "annotation": "【理论】家庭与社会心理学：关系离脱成本。【参照】id:7为组织/头衔；id:16为物/事业；本题为人物关系。【运用】无／部分可／几乎不可；越高越偏自由。" }, { "id": 20, "categoryIndex": 5, "prompt": "在所属的公司、组织或社区中，关于自己无法实质改变的、令人束手束脚的规则或惯例，哪一种最接近你？", "sample": "工作推进方式、成员管理、休息时机、带薪假取得、同调加班、不合理或非效率规定、过时工具、办公室出勤、着装/仪容规定、业绩指标、工时细则、待命或on-call时间、禁止进入区域、交友限制等", "optionA": "几乎不感到束手束脚（仅必要最低限度的规则或惯例）", "optionB": "部分场面或规则下，有时感到束手束脚", "optionC": "多个场面反复感到，或任一条规则已明显影响工作或所属体验", "annotation": "【理论】产业与组织心理学：职务统制与组织规范。【参照】id:19为人际；本题为组织规则/惯例；按影响广度三分，不用百分比。【运用】几乎不感到／部分有时／多处反复或影响大；越高越偏自由。" }, { "id": 21, "categoryIndex": 0, "prompt": "自行挣得的资产中，约有几成被配偶、家人或组织指示或限制用途？", "sample": "共同账户规则、家计审批、家庭或宗教规范、除汇款与税金外的用途限制等", "optionA": "30%以下", "optionB": "30%〜79%", "optionC": "80%以上", "annotation": "【理论】家计社会学：资源支配约束。【参照】裁量资金的反面。【运用】30%以下／30〜79%／80%以上；越少越偏自由。" }, { "id": 22, "categoryIndex": 5, "prompt": "在公司、组织或社区中，有人反对多数派或组织、社区方针时，遭受闲话、冷落、降评等报复的概率？", "sample": "减薪、降级、解雇、身心排斥、断绝关系、暴力或拘束、诉讼、罚款等", "optionA": "10%以下（实质上无惩罚）", "optionB": "10%〜50%（时有惩罚）", "optionC": "51%以上（高概率遭报复）", "annotation": "【理论】组织心理学：心理安全与报复恐惧。【运用】10%以下／10〜50%／51%以上；越低越偏自由。" }, { "id": 23, "categoryIndex": 4, "prompt": "做重要决定时，约有几成若无他人批准或同意便无法推进？", "sample": "职业、学业、跳槽、离职、居住、大额支出、婚恋、生育、创业等", "optionA": "10%以下", "optionB": "10%〜50%", "optionC": "51%以上", "annotation": "【理论】家庭/组织社会学：他人对决策的把关。【参照】指数核心。仅礼节性商量不计。id:21为资产用途。【运用】10%以下／10〜50%／51%以上；越少越偏自由。" }, { "id": 24, "categoryIndex": 3, "prompt": "When you are unwell, how close is your situation to being able to receive needed medical care (visits, tests, medication, procedures) without barriers from money, travel, or time?", "sample": "Commute to clinics, childcare, night/weekend care, insurance and out-of-pocket costs, prescription continuity, specialist wait times, work hours, other", "optionA": "Rarely blocked", "optionB": "Sometimes delayed or I give up", "optionC": "Often delayed, I give up, or cannot access care", "annotation": "[Theory] Healthcare access & barriers: financial, mobility, temporal. [Ref] id:4 substitutes, id:11 health cancellations, id:13 schedule control. [Ops] A rarely / B sometimes / C often; higher is higher freedom." } ] }, "assessmentFlowByLocale": { "ja": "On-screen flow: Intro explainer → cohort gate (5 required anonymous profile fields; residence area optional) → 24 questions (A/B/C; strict N/A) → optional subjective wellbeing (1–5, excluded from index) → result screen (index 0–100, tier C/B/A/S, category breakdown, self-analysis report). Primary action: 3-step AI consultation wizard (profile → task → preview/copy) with a fixed bundle (context, score, profile, category points, compact answers, user notes); external LLMs read /about/ for full question text. UI locales: en, zh, hi, es, ar, pt, ru, fr, ja, ko with full localized question banks. Authoritative copy for external AI: questionsByLocale.en; ja and zh are reference translations in this JSON.", "en": "On-screen flow: Intro explainer → cohort gate (5 required anonymous profile fields; residence area optional) → 24 questions (A/B/C; strict N/A) → optional subjective wellbeing (1–5, excluded from index) → result screen (index 0–100, tier C/B/A/S, category breakdown, self-analysis report). Primary action: 3-step AI consultation wizard (profile → task → preview/copy) with a fixed bundle (context, score, profile, category points, compact answers, user notes); external LLMs read /about/ for full question text. UI locales: en, zh, hi, es, ar, pt, ru, fr, ja, ko with full localized question banks. Authoritative copy for external AI: questionsByLocale.en; ja and zh are reference translations in this JSON.", "zh": "On-screen flow: Intro explainer → cohort gate (5 required anonymous profile fields; residence area optional) → 24 questions (A/B/C; strict N/A) → optional subjective wellbeing (1–5, excluded from index) → result screen (index 0–100, tier C/B/A/S, category breakdown, self-analysis report). Primary action: 3-step AI consultation wizard (profile → task → preview/copy) with a fixed bundle (context, score, profile, category points, compact answers, user notes); external LLMs read /about/ for full question text. UI locales: en, zh, hi, es, ar, pt, ru, fr, ja, ko with full localized question banks. Authoritative copy for external AI: questionsByLocale.en; ja and zh are reference translations in this JSON.", "es": "On-screen flow: Intro explainer → cohort gate (5 required anonymous profile fields; residence area optional) → 24 questions (A/B/C; strict N/A) → optional subjective wellbeing (1–5, excluded from index) → result screen (index 0–100, tier C/B/A/S, category breakdown, self-analysis report). Primary action: 3-step AI consultation wizard (profile → task → preview/copy) with a fixed bundle (context, score, profile, category points, compact answers, user notes); external LLMs read /about/ for full question text. UI locales: en, zh, hi, es, ar, pt, ru, fr, ja, ko with full localized question banks. Authoritative copy for external AI: questionsByLocale.en; ja and zh are reference translations in this JSON.", "hi": "On-screen flow: Intro explainer → cohort gate (5 required anonymous profile fields; residence area optional) → 24 questions (A/B/C; strict N/A) → optional subjective wellbeing (1–5, excluded from index) → result screen (index 0–100, tier C/B/A/S, category breakdown, self-analysis report). Primary action: 3-step AI consultation wizard (profile → task → preview/copy) with a fixed bundle (context, score, profile, category points, compact answers, user notes); external LLMs read /about/ for full question text. UI locales: en, zh, hi, es, ar, pt, ru, fr, ja, ko with full localized question banks. Authoritative copy for external AI: questionsByLocale.en; ja and zh are reference translations in this JSON.", "ar": "On-screen flow: Intro explainer → cohort gate (5 required anonymous profile fields; residence area optional) → 24 questions (A/B/C; strict N/A) → optional subjective wellbeing (1–5, excluded from index) → result screen (index 0–100, tier C/B/A/S, category breakdown, self-analysis report). Primary action: 3-step AI consultation wizard (profile → task → preview/copy) with a fixed bundle (context, score, profile, category points, compact answers, user notes); external LLMs read /about/ for full question text. UI locales: en, zh, hi, es, ar, pt, ru, fr, ja, ko with full localized question banks. Authoritative copy for external AI: questionsByLocale.en; ja and zh are reference translations in this JSON.", "pt": "On-screen flow: Intro explainer → cohort gate (5 required anonymous profile fields; residence area optional) → 24 questions (A/B/C; strict N/A) → optional subjective wellbeing (1–5, excluded from index) → result screen (index 0–100, tier C/B/A/S, category breakdown, self-analysis report). Primary action: 3-step AI consultation wizard (profile → task → preview/copy) with a fixed bundle (context, score, profile, category points, compact answers, user notes); external LLMs read /about/ for full question text. UI locales: en, zh, hi, es, ar, pt, ru, fr, ja, ko with full localized question banks. Authoritative copy for external AI: questionsByLocale.en; ja and zh are reference translations in this JSON.", "fr": "On-screen flow: Intro explainer → cohort gate (5 required anonymous profile fields; residence area optional) → 24 questions (A/B/C; strict N/A) → optional subjective wellbeing (1–5, excluded from index) → result screen (index 0–100, tier C/B/A/S, category breakdown, self-analysis report). Primary action: 3-step AI consultation wizard (profile → task → preview/copy) with a fixed bundle (context, score, profile, category points, compact answers, user notes); external LLMs read /about/ for full question text. UI locales: en, zh, hi, es, ar, pt, ru, fr, ja, ko with full localized question banks. Authoritative copy for external AI: questionsByLocale.en; ja and zh are reference translations in this JSON.", "ru": "On-screen flow: Intro explainer → cohort gate (5 required anonymous profile fields; residence area optional) → 24 questions (A/B/C; strict N/A) → optional subjective wellbeing (1–5, excluded from index) → result screen (index 0–100, tier C/B/A/S, category breakdown, self-analysis report). Primary action: 3-step AI consultation wizard (profile → task → preview/copy) with a fixed bundle (context, score, profile, category points, compact answers, user notes); external LLMs read /about/ for full question text. UI locales: en, zh, hi, es, ar, pt, ru, fr, ja, ko with full localized question banks. Authoritative copy for external AI: questionsByLocale.en; ja and zh are reference translations in this JSON.", "ko": "On-screen flow: Intro explainer → cohort gate (5 required anonymous profile fields; residence area optional) → 24 questions (A/B/C; strict N/A) → optional subjective wellbeing (1–5, excluded from index) → result screen (index 0–100, tier C/B/A/S, category breakdown, self-analysis report). Primary action: 3-step AI consultation wizard (profile → task → preview/copy) with a fixed bundle (context, score, profile, category points, compact answers, user notes); external LLMs read /about/ for full question text. UI locales: en, zh, hi, es, ar, pt, ru, fr, ja, ko with full localized question banks. Authoritative copy for external AI: questionsByLocale.en; ja and zh are reference translations in this JSON." }, "notesForExternalUse": [ "Authoritative question copy for external AI and verification: questionsByLocale.en. ja and zh are included as reference translations.", "Static AI-facing HTML is at /about/ (English body text). Machine-readable JSON is at /spec/personal_freedom_index_spec.json.", "AI consultation prompts tell LLMs to load /about/ first, then answer a selected task using the user's score and profile summary.", "Anonymous profile: 5 fields required before questions; education, industry, and occupation required in the AI wizard. See anonymousProfile.", "Residence area labels use neutral wording (large metro area vs mid-size city/town/other), not value-laden urban/rural framing.", "N/A policy (strict): only when the question objectively does not apply to the respondent; see scoring.naApplicabilityPolicy and project spec §5.1.1.", "Subjective wellbeing (1–5) is optional and never affects the index.", "Simulation personas are not predefined; map them to A/B/C per question.", "Schema version increments when breaking changes are made to shape or meaning of fields.", "Release builds inline this document into index.html for no-JS fetch." ], "siteOverviewByLocale": { "ja": "Personal Freedom Indicator は、職業選択、住居、家計、生活インフラ、家族・人間関係などについて、ある程度の選択肢が存在する環境を前提に、「個人の自由度」を自己分析するためのツールです。\n\n【注意事項】\n・本ツールは、あなたの「幸福度」を測るものではありません。\n・あなたの能力や人間としての価値を判定するものではありません。\n・自由時間や流動性をスコアの一部として採用しているため、無償のケア労働（育児・介護）や家事労働を多く担っている生活では、結果のうち時間や移動に関わる部分が強く表れやすくなります。", "en": "Personal Freedom Indicator is a self-analysis tool for your personal freedom, assuming an environment where you have some choices regarding career, housing, household finances, life infrastructure, family, and relationships.\n\nImportant notices\n• This tool does not measure your happiness.\n• It does not judge your abilities or your worth as a person.\n• Because time and mobility are part of the score, results often reflect time and movement more strongly in lives with heavy unpaid care (childcare, elder care) or household work. That shows how your daily life maps onto this index—not a moral judgment.", "zh": "Personal Freedom Indicator 是一款自我分析工具，用于分析个人自由度；其前提是：在职业选择、居住、家计、生活基础设施、家庭与人际关系等方面，存在一定可选空间的环境。\n\n【注意事项】\n・本工具不测量你的「幸福度」。\n・本工具不评判你的能力或作为一个人的价值。\n・由于分数包含可支配时间与流动性，承担大量无偿照护（育儿、看护）或家务的生活，其结果中时间与移动相关部分往往更明显。这反映生活构成，并非道德评判。", "es": "Personal Freedom Indicator es una herramienta de autoanálisis de tu libertad personal, suponiendo un entorno en el que existen ciertas opciones en empleo, vivienda, economía doméstica, infraestructura vital, familia y relaciones.\n\nAvisos importantes\n• Esta herramienta no mide tu felicidad.\n• No juzga tus capacidades ni tu valor como persona.\n• Como el tiempo y la movilidad forman parte de la puntuación, en vidas con mucho cuidado no remunerado o trabajo doméstico, la parte de tiempo y movimiento suele reflejarse con más fuerza. Indica cómo se traduce tu vida en el índice, no un juicio moral.", "hi": "Personal Freedom Indicator व्यक्तिगत स्वतंत्रता का स्व-विश्लेषण करने का उपकरण है, इस आधार पर कि करियर, आवास, घरेलू वित्त, जीवन अवसंरचना, परिवार और रिश्तों में कुछ विकल्प मौजूद हैं।\n\nमहत्वपूर्ण सूचनाएँ\n• यह उपकरण आपकी खुशी नहीं मापता।\n• यह आपकी क्षमता या इंसान के रूप में आपके मूल्य का निर्णय नहीं करता।\n• स्कोर में समय और गतिशीलता शामिल हैं, इसलिए बिना वेतन देखभाल या घरेलू काम भारी होने पर परिणाम में समय और चलन संबंधी हिस्सा अक्सर अधिक दिखाई देता है। यह जीवन की बनावट दिखाता है, नैतिक निर्णय नहीं।", "ar": "Personal Freedom Indicator أداة تحليل ذاتي لحرية الفرد، بافتراض بيئة توجد فيها خيارات إلى حد ما في العمل والسكن والمال والبنية التحتية للحياة والأسرة والعلاقات.\n\nملاحظات مهمة\n• هذه الأداة لا تقيس سعادتك.\n• ولا يحكم على قدراتك أو قيمتك كإنسان.\n• لأن الوقت والتنقل جزء من النتيجة، ففي حياة تتحمّل فيها رعاية غير مدفوعة أو أعمال منزلية كثيرة، يظهر جزء الوقت والحركة بقوة أكبر. ذلك يعكس تركيب الحياة وليس حكمًا أخلاقيًا.", "pt": "Personal Freedom Indicator é uma ferramenta de autoanálise da sua liberdade pessoal, assumindo um ambiente em que há certas opções quanto a trabalho, moradia, finanças domésticas, infraestrutura de vida, família e relações.\n\nAvisos importantes\n• Esta ferramenta não mede sua felicidade.\n• Não julga sua capacidade nem seu valor como pessoa.\n• Como tempo e mobilidade fazem parte da pontuação, vidas com muito cuidado não remunerado ou trabalho doméstico costumam refletir mais tempo e deslocamento no resultado. Isso mostra como a vida se traduz no índice, não um julgamento moral.", "fr": "Personal Freedom Indicator est un outil d’auto-analyse de votre liberté personnelle, en supposant un environnement où existent certaines options en matière d’emploi, de logement, de budget, d’infrastructure de vie, de famille et de relations.\n\nPoints importants\n• Cet outil ne mesure pas votre bonheur.\n• Il ne juge ni vos capacités ni votre valeur en tant que personne.\n• Le temps et la mobilité entrant dans le score, les vies avec beaucoup de soins non rémunérés ou de travail domestique y voient souvent le temps et le déplacement plus marqués. Cela reflète la composition de la vie, pas un jugement moral.", "ru": "Personal Freedom Indicator — инструмент самоанализа личной свободы при предположении, что в выборе работы, жилья, бюджета, жизненной инфраструктуры, семьи и отношений есть определённые варианты.\n\nВажные примечания\n• Этот инструмент не измеряет ваше счастье.\n• Он не оценивает ваши способности или вашу ценность как человека.\n• Поскольку время и мобильность входят в оценку, при большой неоплачиваемой заботе или домашней нагрузке в результате сильнее проявляются время и перемещение. Это отражение состава жизни, а не моральная оценка.", "ko": "Personal Freedom Indicator는 직업, 주거, 가계, 생활 인프라, 가족·인간관계 등에서 어느 정도 선택지가 있는 환경을 전제로, 개인의 자유도를 자기분석하는 도구입니다.\n\n【유의 사항】\n・이 도구는 당신의 「행복도」를 재지 않습니다.\n・당신의 능력이나 인간으로서의 가치를 판단하지 않습니다.\n・점수에 자유 시간과 이동성이 포함되므로, 무급 돌봄(육아·간병)이나 가사를 많이 맡은 삶에서는 결과 중 시간·이동 요소가 더 두드러지기 쉽습니다. 삶의 구성이 지표에 어떻게 반영되는지를 보여 줄 뿐, 도덕적 판단이 아닙니다." } }